PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. FVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. FVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than FVAL's 15.55% return.


VTV

1D
1.30%
1M
2.14%
6M
11.73%
YTD
18.44%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
12.61%
ALL TIME*
9.75%

FVAL

1D
1.54%
1M
5.55%
6M
13.44%
YTD
15.55%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.65M$3.84M$2.99M
$668.29M$673.37M$627.33M

VTV vs. FVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
18.44%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
15.55%19.56%18.05%23.10%-14.40%30.33%9.08%30.33%-7.87%22.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and FVAL is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.88

The correlation between VTV and FVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTV vs. FVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
FVAL

Financial Services

22.4%
12.5%

Technology

15.3%
33.6%

Healthcare

15.2%
10.7%

Industrials

14.3%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.6%

Energy

6.9%
3.2%

Utilities

4.8%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
10.4%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
9.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.6%

Financial Services

VTV
22.4%
FVAL
12.5%

Technology

VTV
15.3%
FVAL
33.6%

Healthcare

VTV
15.2%
FVAL
10.7%

Industrials

VTV
14.3%
FVAL
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
8.7%
FVAL
4.6%

Energy

VTV
6.9%
FVAL
3.2%

Utilities

VTV
4.8%
FVAL
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
3.9%
FVAL
10.4%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.0%
FVAL
1.9%

Communication Services

VTV
2.9%
FVAL
9.4%

Real Estate

VTV
2.5%
FVAL
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. FVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FVAL
FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTV vs. FVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVFVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.46

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.73

14.15

+3.58

VTV vs. FVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the FVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and FVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTV vs. FVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than FVAL's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and FVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVFVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-37.26%

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-8.92%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-18.39%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-23.42%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-4.53%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.18%

-0.54%

Volatility

VTV vs. FVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.83%, while Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVFVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.37%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

9.42%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

12.21%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

16.51%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

18.03%

-1.41%

VTV vs. FVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FVAL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. FVAL - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FVAL's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
1.51%1.61%1.60%1.69%1.79%1.41%1.61%1.77%2.06%1.62%0.45%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and FVAL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVAL has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to VTV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs FVAL's -37.26%.

On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.93% vs 12.61% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 12.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FVAL.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.51% for FVAL.

VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.15% for FVAL.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and FVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer