VTP vs. VUG
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
VTP vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 3.21% return.
VTP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 17.99%
VTP vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.10% | 2.46% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 3.21% | 11.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and VUG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VUG
VTP vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -50.68% | +48.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -7.15% | +6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -7.09% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 16.88% | -13.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 22.38% | -19.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 21.50% | -18.15% |
VTP vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and VUG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VTP.
VTP has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for VTP and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer