VTP vs. VUG
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
VTP vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
VTP vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and VUG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
VUG
VTP vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.62 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
VTP vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -50.68% | +48.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.51% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -7.09% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.71% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 15.84% | -12.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 22.22% | -18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 21.44% | -18.18% |
VTP vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and VUG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VTP.
VTP has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for VTP and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer