VTP vs. VGIT
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VGIT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.
Performance
VTP vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.46% return.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGIT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
VTP vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.46% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and VGIT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
VGIT
VTP vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTP | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.49 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
VTP vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and VGIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -16.05% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -2.39% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.52% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 3.38% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 5.38% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 4.50% | -1.24% |
VTP vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than VGIT's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and VGIT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VTP.
VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VGIT is Government Bonds. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.03% for VGIT.
Find the right allocation for VTP and VGIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer