VTP vs. SCHR
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VTP returned 1.86% vs 1.17% for SCHR. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VTP vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHR's -0.76% return.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 1.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.79%
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.30M | $60.69M | $73.53M | |
| $3.99M | $3.36M | $2.41M |
VTP vs. SCHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 0.49% | 2.46% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.76% | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and SCHR is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VTP and SCHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. SCHR — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
SCHR
VTP vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 0.77 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 1.77 | +1.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHR drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and SCHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -16.11% | +14.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -2.79% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.69% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -3.63% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.21% | -0.49% |
Volatility
VTP vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) is 0.73%, while Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that VTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.86% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | 2.62% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 3.41% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 5.39% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 4.47% | -1.16% |
VTP vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VTP and SCHR have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than SCHR's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.60% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 2.99% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and SCHR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHR has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to VTP (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTP dropped -1.92% vs SCHR's -16.11%.
On 1-year performance, VTP leads with 1.86% vs 1.17% for SCHR. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTP has performed better with a 1.86% return vs 1.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTP and SCHR have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 2.99% for VTP.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SCHR is Government Bonds. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index, while SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
VTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTP and SCHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer