VTP vs. SCHR
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VTP vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCHR's -0.43% return.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
VTP vs. SCHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 0.75% | 2.46% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and SCHR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. SCHR — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHR
VTP vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum SCHR drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and SCHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -16.11% | +14.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -2.37% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -3.63% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 3.42% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 5.38% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 4.47% | -1.13% |
VTP vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VTP and SCHR have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than SCHR's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and SCHR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP and SCHR have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SCHR is Government Bonds. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
Find the right allocation for VTP and SCHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer