VTI vs. GXLC
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.
Performance
VTI vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTI having a 10.70% return and GXLC slightly lower at 10.27%.
VTI
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
GXLC
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 10.70% | 2.76% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 10.27% | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and GXLC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and GXLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -9.08% | -46.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.29% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -1.53% | -6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility
VTI vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | GXLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 13.82% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 13.82% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 13.82% | +4.53% |
VTI vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTI vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than GXLC's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.63% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VTI and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for VTI.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.63% for GXLC.
VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.02% for GXLC.
Find the right allocation for VTI and GXLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer