GXLC vs. TOS

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and TOS (Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while TOS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for TOS.

Performance

GXLC vs. TOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GXLC

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 8.02%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOS

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC vs. TOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	6.03%
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF	19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC and TOS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026	0.81

Return for Risk

GXLC vs. TOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF (TOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GXLC vs. TOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum TOS drawdown of -11.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and TOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXLC	TOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-11.72%	+2.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-2.52%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-2.51%	+0.94%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXLC	TOS	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	26.63%	-12.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	26.63%	-12.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	26.63%	-12.88%

GXLC vs. TOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than TOS's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXLC vs. TOS - Dividend Comparison

GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while TOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%
TOS Twin Oak Strategic Solutions ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXLC and TOS in my portfolio?

GXLC and TOS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXLC or TOS?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXLC or TOS?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXLC or TOS?

GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for TOS.

What is the main difference between GXLC and TOS?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Twin Oak ETF Company. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.76% for TOS.