PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHRX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHRX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHRX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than URINX's 5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHRX has outperformed URINX with an annualized return of 8.46%, while URINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return.


VTHRX

1D
1.26%
1M
-0.57%
6M
4.33%
YTD
6.47%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
12.36%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
8.46%
ALL TIME*
7.22%

URINX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.17%
6M
4.23%
YTD
5.97%
1Y
11.68%
3Y*
9.68%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
6.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VTHRX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.47%16.25%10.43%16.24%-16.28%11.37%14.11%21.08%-5.85%15.24%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.97%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHRX and URINX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2008

0.92

The correlation between VTHRX and URINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHRX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTHRX
VTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTHRX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTHRXURINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.94

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

12.40

-3.68

VTHRX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHRX and URINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTHRX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and URINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.57%

-15.27%

-34.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-3.92%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-4.84%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-15.27%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

-15.27%

-9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-0.30%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-1.90%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.93%

+0.65%

Volatility

VTHRX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 1.44%. This indicates that VTHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

1.44%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

4.82%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.87%

5.64%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

6.37%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.22%

5.87%

+5.35%

VTHRX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHRX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than URINX's 5.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.81%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
3.79%4.03%3.63%2.59%2.53%17.56%2.56%2.38%2.71%0.06%2.38%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTHRX and URINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTHRX has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to URINX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHRX dropped -49.57% vs URINX's -15.27%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHRX and URINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer