PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHRX vs. SWDRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHRX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than SWDRX's 6.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTHRX having a 8.89% annualized return and SWDRX not far behind at 8.60%.


VTHRX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.65%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
8.89%

SWDRX

1D
0.06%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.57%
6M
7.21%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.80%16.25%10.43%16.24%-16.28%11.37%14.11%21.08%-5.85%15.24%
SWDRX
Schwab Target 2030 Fund
6.57%14.87%10.52%16.38%-17.00%12.52%13.49%20.41%-7.20%17.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHRX and SWDRX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2006

0.98

The correlation between VTHRX and SWDRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTHRX
SWDRX

Technology

27.4%
26.0%

Financial Services

16.0%
12.0%

Industrials

12.3%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
10.6%

Communication Services

8.0%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.6%

Energy

4.3%
4.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.5%

Utilities

2.7%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.5%
7.4%

Technology

VTHRX
27.4%
SWDRX
26.0%

Financial Services

VTHRX
16.0%
SWDRX
12.0%

Industrials

VTHRX
12.3%
SWDRX
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTHRX
9.4%
SWDRX
9.3%

Healthcare

VTHRX
8.3%
SWDRX
10.6%

Communication Services

VTHRX
8.0%
SWDRX
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

VTHRX
4.8%
SWDRX
4.6%

Energy

VTHRX
4.3%
SWDRX
4.3%

Basic Materials

VTHRX
4.2%
SWDRX
3.5%

Utilities

VTHRX
2.7%
SWDRX
2.0%

Real Estate

VTHRX
2.5%
SWDRX
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHRX vs. SWDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHRX
VTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDRX
SWDRX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SWDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTHRXSWDRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.31

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

3.29

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.85

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.41

12.52

+0.89

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SWDRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHRX and SWDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTHRXSWDRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.31

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.51

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.70

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Drawdowns

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, which is greater than SWDRX's maximum drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and SWDRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRXSWDRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.57%

-45.34%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-6.27%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-9.71%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-28.17%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

-28.17%

+3.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-6.48%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.43%

+0.06%

Volatility

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) at 2.35%. This indicates that VTHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRXSWDRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.35%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

6.11%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.09%

7.74%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

12.58%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

12.27%

-1.01%

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDRX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Dividend Comparison

VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than SWDRX's 7.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWDRX
Schwab Target 2030 Fund
7.80%8.31%6.37%4.28%6.77%6.92%3.23%6.60%7.03%4.86%5.87%9.35%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
3.74%4.03%3.63%2.59%2.53%17.56%2.56%2.38%2.71%0.06%2.38%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VTHRX and SWDRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTHRX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to SWDRX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHRX dropped -49.57% vs SWDRX's -45.34%.

VTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHRX and SWDRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer