VTHRX vs. SWDRX
VTHRX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund) and SWDRX (Schwab Target 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, VTHRX returned 8.89%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for SWDRX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTHRX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SWDRX.
Performance
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTHRX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than SWDRX's 6.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTHRX having a 8.89% annualized return and SWDRX not far behind at 8.60%.
VTHRX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
SWDRX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHRX Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 7.80% | 16.25% | 10.43% | 16.24% | -16.28% | 11.37% | 14.11% | 21.08% | -5.85% | 15.24% |
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 6.57% | 14.87% | 10.52% | 16.38% | -17.00% | 12.52% | 13.49% | 20.41% | -7.20% | 17.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHRX and SWDRX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2006 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VTHRX and SWDRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTHRX
SWDRX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VTHRX
SWDRX
Financial Services
VTHRX
SWDRX
Industrials
VTHRX
SWDRX
Consumer Cyclical
VTHRX
SWDRX
Healthcare
VTHRX
SWDRX
Communication Services
VTHRX
SWDRX
Consumer Defensive
VTHRX
SWDRX
Energy
VTHRX
SWDRX
Basic Materials
VTHRX
SWDRX
Utilities
VTHRX
SWDRX
Real Estate
VTHRX
SWDRX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHRX vs. SWDRX — Risk / Return Rank
VTHRX
SWDRX
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.31 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 3.29 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.43 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.85 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | 12.52 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.31 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.51 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.70 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, which is greater than SWDRX's maximum drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and SWDRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.57% | -45.34% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.56% | -6.27% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | -9.71% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -28.17% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.86% | -28.17% | +3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.48% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.43% | +0.06% |
Volatility
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) at 2.35%. This indicates that VTHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.35% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.53% | 6.11% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.09% | 7.74% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 12.58% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 12.27% | -1.01% |
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDRX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Dividend Comparison
VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than SWDRX's 7.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 7.80% | 8.31% | 6.37% | 4.28% | 6.77% | 6.92% | 3.23% | 6.60% | 7.03% | 4.86% | 5.87% | 9.35% |
VTHRX Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 3.74% | 4.03% | 3.63% | 2.59% | 2.53% | 17.56% | 2.56% | 2.38% | 2.71% | 0.06% | 2.38% | 3.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VTHRX and SWDRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTHRX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to SWDRX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHRX dropped -49.57% vs SWDRX's -45.34%.
VTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHRX and SWDRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer