VTHRX vs. SWDRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX).
VTHRX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Jun 7, 2006. SWDRX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHRX Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund | -2.79% | 16.25% | 10.43% | 16.24% | -16.28% | 11.37% | 14.11% | 21.08% | -5.85% | 15.24% |
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | -2.75% | 14.87% | 10.52% | 16.38% | -17.00% | 12.52% | 13.49% | 20.41% | -7.20% | 17.55% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTHRX having a -2.79% return and SWDRX slightly higher at -2.75%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTHRX having a 8.00% annualized return and SWDRX not far behind at 7.79%.
VTHRX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- -2.79%
- 6M
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
SWDRX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- -2.75%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDRX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VTHRX vs. SWDRX — Risk / Return Rank
VTHRX
SWDRX
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.64 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.45 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 6.49 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.14 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.44 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.64 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHRX and SWDRX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Dividend Comparison
VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than SWDRX's 8.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHRX Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 4.15% | 4.03% | 3.63% | 2.59% | 2.53% | 17.56% | 2.56% | 2.38% | 2.71% | 0.06% | 2.38% | 3.72% |
SWDRX Schwab Target 2030 Fund | 8.54% | 8.31% | 6.37% | 4.28% | 6.77% | 6.92% | 3.23% | 6.60% | 7.03% | 4.86% | 5.87% | 9.35% |
Drawdowns
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, which is greater than SWDRX's maximum drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and SWDRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.57% | -45.34% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.25% | -7.27% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.75% | -28.17% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.86% | -28.17% | +3.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -6.22% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -6.53% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.62% | +0.03% |
Volatility
VTHRX vs. SWDRX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Schwab Target 2030 Fund (SWDRX) at 3.28%. This indicates that VTHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VTHRX | SWDRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 3.28% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 5.75% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 10.03% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 12.55% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 12.25% | -1.03% |