VTHR vs. SPXM
VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VTHR is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. Over the past year, VTHR returned 21.62% vs 8.67% for SPXM. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTHR charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
VTHR vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTHR vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.84% | 10.17% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHR and SPXM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.53 |
The correlation between VTHR and SPXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHR vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
VTHR
SPXM
VTHR vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTHR | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.10 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 9.84 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTHR vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHR | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -5.08% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -5.08% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.75% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -0.78% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility
VTHR vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that VTHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHR | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 0.00% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 3.99% | +6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 7.68% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 7.64% | +9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 7.64% | +10.19% |
VTHR vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTHR vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTHR and SPXM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTHR has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs SPXM's -5.08%.
On 1-year performance, VTHR leads with 21.62% vs 8.67% for SPXM. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 21.62% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTHR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.47% for SPXM.
VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHR and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer