PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VT having a 12.24% return and VYM slightly higher at 12.47%. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 12.74%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and VYM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.87

The correlation between VT and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VT vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
VYM

Technology

27.8%
17.7%

Financial Services

15.9%
20.5%

Industrials

12.0%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
6.7%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.1%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
8.1%

Energy

4.3%
9.8%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.5%

Utilities

2.7%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.0%

Technology

VT
27.8%
VYM
17.7%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
VYM
20.5%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
VYM
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
VYM
6.7%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
VYM
3.5%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
VYM
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

VT
4.3%
VYM
9.8%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
VYM
3.5%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
VYM
5.7%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.93

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

14.76

-1.23

VT vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.56

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.83

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.51

-0.07

Drawdowns

VT vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-56.98%

+6.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-6.69%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-14.46%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-15.84%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-35.21%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.43%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-7.19%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.78%

+0.39%

Volatility

VT vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

2.77%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

7.67%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

10.28%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

13.96%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

16.34%

+0.89%

VT vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and VYM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer