PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.74%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and VUG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.89

The correlation between VT and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
VUG

Technology

27.8%
53.5%

Financial Services

15.9%
4.3%

Industrials

12.0%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
12.2%

Communication Services

8.3%
17.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
1.5%

Energy

4.3%
0.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.6%

Utilities

2.7%
0.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.0%

Technology

VT
27.8%
VUG
53.5%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
VUG
4.3%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
VUG
12.2%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
VUG
17.3%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
VUG
1.5%

Energy

VT
4.3%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
VUG
0.6%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
VUG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

1.77

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

2.40

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.69

+1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.53

5.92

+7.61

VT vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.77

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.68

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.85

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Drawdowns

VT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-50.68%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-16.53%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-22.85%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-35.61%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-35.61%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.51%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-7.09%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

4.71%

-2.54%

Volatility

VT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.83%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

12.11%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

15.84%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

22.22%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

21.44%

-4.21%

VT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and VUG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 12.74% for VT. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 12.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.03% for VUG.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer