PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 12.93%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.91% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.44%
1M
1.80%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.82%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
12.93%

SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
11.06%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and SPYG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.89

The correlation between VT and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
SPYG

Technology

27.8%
53.2%

Financial Services

15.9%
8.4%

Industrials

12.0%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.3%
16.1%

Healthcare

8.1%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
0.9%

Energy

4.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.3%

Utilities

2.7%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.5%

Technology

VT
27.8%
SPYG
53.2%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
SPYG
8.4%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
SPYG
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
SPYG
16.1%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
SPYG
0.9%

Energy

VT
4.3%
SPYG
0.1%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
SPYG
0.3%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
SPYG
1.1%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
SPYG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.01

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

8.08

+3.58

VT vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-67.63%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-13.76%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-22.14%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-32.67%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-32.67%

-1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-4.65%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-24.30%

+17.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.42%

-1.20%

Volatility

VT vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.26%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

6.33%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

13.48%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

16.81%

-3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

21.27%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

20.70%

-3.43%

VT vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and SPYG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.91% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.91% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.04% for SPYG.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer