VT vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.61%/yr vs 18.53%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

VT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.61%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.53% annualized return.

VT

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 12.61%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 14.90%
• 10Y*: 18.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	9.77%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	3.75%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and SCHG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.89

The correlation between VT and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VT	SCHG
Technology	27.8%	46.3%
Financial Services	15.9%	6.7%
Industrials	12.0%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	12.7%
Communication Services	8.3%	16.0%
Healthcare	8.1%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	1.7%
Energy	4.3%	0.8%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.4%
Utilities	2.7%	0.4%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.5%

Return for Risk

VT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 65
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.33	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.82	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.24	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.27	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	4.25	+7.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	1.33	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.67	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.86	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.83	-0.40

Drawdowns

VT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-34.59%	-15.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-16.41%	+6.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-23.39%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	-34.59%	+8.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	-34.59%	+0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-4.25%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-5.20%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	4.91%	-2.72%

Volatility

VT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.55% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	4.52%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	12.02%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	15.77%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	22.31%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	21.58%	-4.32%

VT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.63%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and SCHG in my portfolio?

VT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or SCHG?

VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, VT or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.53% vs 12.61% for VT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VT or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 12.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or SCHG?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between VT and SCHG?

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.