PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. FNDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 7.62%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.


VSS

1D
-0.93%
1M
-5.21%
6M
0.59%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
7.62%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

FNDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.37%
6M
10.86%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
4.76%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
19.19%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and FNDA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.73

The correlation between VSS and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
FNDA

Industrials

19.5%
19.1%

Technology

14.9%
15.2%

Basic Materials

11.6%
4.3%

Financial Services

10.5%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
12.4%

Real Estate

7.0%
10.0%

Healthcare

5.9%
7.8%

Energy

4.0%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.9%

Utilities

2.3%
3.0%

Communication Services

2.1%
3.7%

Industrials

VSS
19.5%
FNDA
19.1%

Technology

VSS
14.9%
FNDA
15.2%

Basic Materials

VSS
11.6%
FNDA
4.3%

Financial Services

VSS
10.5%
FNDA
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.1%
FNDA
12.4%

Real Estate

VSS
7.0%
FNDA
10.0%

Healthcare

VSS
5.9%
FNDA
7.8%

Energy

VSS
4.0%
FNDA
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.6%
FNDA
3.9%

Utilities

VSS
2.3%
FNDA
3.0%

Communication Services

VSS
2.1%
FNDA
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSFNDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.29

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.07

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

9.90

-5.78

VSS vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and FNDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSFNDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-44.64%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-9.36%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-25.92%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-25.92%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-44.64%

+1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.70%

-1.76%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-6.64%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.90%

+0.53%

Volatility

VSS vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA) at 3.51%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSFNDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

3.51%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

12.09%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

17.10%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

20.74%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

22.32%

-5.20%

VSS vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSS vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than FNDA's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
1.11%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.33%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and FNDA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSS has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FNDA (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 10.83% vs 7.62% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 1.11% for FNDA.

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while FNDA tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity U.S. Small Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and FNDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer