PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. EEMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than EEMS's 14.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed EEMS with an annualized return of 8.07%, while EEMS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return.


VSS

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.27%
YTD
10.57%
6M
13.10%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
8.07%

EEMS

1D
-1.36%
1M
1.46%
YTD
14.63%
6M
16.52%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.57%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
14.63%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and EEMS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2011

0.80

The correlation between VSS and EEMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. EEMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
EEMS

Industrials

18.7%
18.9%

Technology

13.3%
22.7%

Basic Materials

12.1%
9.3%

Financial Services

10.8%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.6%

Real Estate

7.3%
5.9%

Healthcare

6.2%
9.4%

Energy

4.9%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
5.2%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.9%

Industrials

VSS
18.7%
EEMS
18.9%

Technology

VSS
13.3%
EEMS
22.7%

Basic Materials

VSS
12.1%
EEMS
9.3%

Financial Services

VSS
10.8%
EEMS
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.3%
EEMS
9.6%

Real Estate

VSS
7.3%
EEMS
5.9%

Healthcare

VSS
6.2%
EEMS
9.4%

Energy

VSS
4.9%
EEMS
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.4%
EEMS
5.2%

Utilities

VSS
2.5%
EEMS
2.7%

Communication Services

VSS
2.3%
EEMS
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSSEEMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.72

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

9.56

-0.43

VSS vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and EEMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSSEEMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.71

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.43

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.52

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.32

+0.23

Drawdowns

VSS vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and EEMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSEEMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-48.89%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-10.87%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-19.71%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-27.07%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-48.89%

+5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-2.41%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-10.50%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.08%

-0.08%

Volatility

VSS vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 5.33%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSEEMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

7.07%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

14.90%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

17.30%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.06%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.99%

-0.72%

VSS vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than EEMS's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.69%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.07%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and EEMS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VSS (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs EEMS's -48.89%.

On 10-year performance, EEMS leads with 9.29% vs 8.07% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEMS has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.69% for EEMS.

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while EEMS is Emerging Markets Diversified. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.73% for EEMS.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and EEMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer