VSDA vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VSDA (VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VSDA tracks the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSDA returned 6.69%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for SCHG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VSDA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

VSDA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 6.42% return.

VSDA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 4.72%
• 6M: 4.63%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: 9.81%
• 5Y*: 6.69%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	4.72%	6.67%	9.40%	8.74%	-4.42%	21.95%	12.72%	31.39%	-1.40%	14.27%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	18.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and SCHG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between VSDA and SCHG has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VSDA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSDA	SCHG
Consumer Defensive	31.5%	1.7%
Financial Services	21.0%	6.7%
Industrials	16.8%	5.8%
Basic Materials	8.0%	1.4%
Healthcare	7.6%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	12.7%
Technology	4.7%	46.3%
Utilities	2.7%	0.4%
Energy	2.5%	0.8%
Communication Services	0.1%	16.0%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.5%

Return for Risk

VSDA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA

VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 24
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSDA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.60	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.18	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.28	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.51	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.84	5.04	-2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSDA vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSDA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	1.60	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.70	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.84	-0.18

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSDA	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.12%	-34.59%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-16.41%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-23.39%	+7.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.14%	-34.59%	+18.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.28%	-1.78%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-5.20%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	4.90%	-1.23%

Volatility

VSDA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 2.84%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSDA	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	3.61%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	11.62%	-3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.23%	15.50%	-4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	22.27%	-8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	21.55%	-4.96%

VSDA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSDA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	2.61%	2.65%	2.36%	1.92%	1.83%	1.40%	1.49%	1.36%	1.69%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSDA and SCHG in my portfolio?

VSDA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSDA or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to VSDA (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, VSDA or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 15.59% vs 6.69% for VSDA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VSDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VSDA or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 15.59% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VSDA or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VSDA or SCHG?

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between VSDA and SCHG?

VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.