PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOTE vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOTE vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VOTE having a 10.66% return and SPTM slightly higher at 10.86%.


VOTE

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.43%
6M
8.60%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*

SPTM

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.17%
6M
8.54%
YTD
10.86%
1Y
21.57%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOTE vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
10.66%17.95%25.23%27.60%-19.74%11.77%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
10.86%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VOTE and SPTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021

0.99

The correlation between VOTE and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOTE vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOTE
SPTM

Technology

39.0%
37.4%

Financial Services

10.9%
11.4%

Communication Services

10.7%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.4%

Energy

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

2.0%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

VOTE
39.0%
SPTM
37.4%

Financial Services

VOTE
10.9%
SPTM
11.4%

Communication Services

VOTE
10.7%
SPTM
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VOTE
9.9%
SPTM
10.1%

Healthcare

VOTE
8.3%
SPTM
8.4%

Industrials

VOTE
8.1%
SPTM
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOTE
4.4%
SPTM
4.4%

Energy

VOTE
3.2%
SPTM
3.3%

Utilities

VOTE
2.0%
SPTM
2.1%

Basic Materials

VOTE
1.7%
SPTM
1.9%

Real Estate

VOTE
1.7%
SPTM
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOTE vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOTE vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOTESPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.50

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

11.03

-0.68

VOTE vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOTE and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOTE vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOTE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOTE and SPTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTESPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-54.80%

+29.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-8.68%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-18.87%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-24.14%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.88%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-9.02%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.96%

+0.14%

Volatility

VOTE vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 4.02% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTESPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.98%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

9.90%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

12.53%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

16.97%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

18.02%

-0.90%

VOTE vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOTE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOTE vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SPTM's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
0.94%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VOTE and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOTE has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to SPTM (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOTE dropped -25.71% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 5-year performance, VOTE leads with 12.72% vs 12.66% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VOTE.

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.94% for VOTE.

VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Engine No. 1 LLC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOTE and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOTE and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer