VOT vs. SCHR
VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and SCHR (Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while SCHR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 11.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for SCHR. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VOT vs. SCHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHR's -0.76% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has outperformed SCHR with an annualized return of 11.95%, while SCHR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.
VOT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SCHR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
VOT vs. SCHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 5.49% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.76% | 7.33% | 1.42% | 4.27% | -10.58% | -2.62% | 7.72% | 6.18% | 1.46% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and SCHR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010 | -0.16 |
The correlation between VOT and SCHR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOT vs. SCHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOT
SCHR
Technology
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
VOT
SCHR
Industrials
VOT
SCHR
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOT
SCHR
-
Healthcare
VOT
SCHR
-
Financial Services
VOT
SCHR
Real Estate
VOT
SCHR
-
Communication Services
VOT
SCHR
-
Utilities
VOT
SCHR
-
Energy
VOT
SCHR
-
Basic Materials
VOT
SCHR
-
Consumer Defensive
VOT
SCHR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. SCHR — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
SCHR
VOT vs. SCHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOT | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 1.29 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.46 | 3.75 | -2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOT | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.07 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.01 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.26 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
VOT vs. SCHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than SCHR's maximum drawdown of -16.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and SCHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -16.11% | -44.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -2.79% | -13.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -4.35% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -15.07% | -22.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -16.11% | -21.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -2.69% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -3.64% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 0.96% | +4.37% |
Volatility
VOT vs. SCHR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) at 1.04%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | SCHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 1.04% | +4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 2.36% | +10.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 3.36% | +12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 5.38% | +16.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 4.47% | +16.55% |
VOT vs. SCHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VOT and SCHR have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOT vs. SCHR - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SCHR's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.93% | 3.85% | 3.77% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.63% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOT and SCHR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SCHR (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs SCHR's -16.11%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 11.95% vs 1.15% for SCHR. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOT and SCHR have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
SCHR has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.63% for VOT.
VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SCHR is Government Bonds. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
SCHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOT and SCHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer