SCHR vs. IEF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF).
SCHR and IEF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHR is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (3-10 Y). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. IEF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 26, 2002. Both SCHR and IEF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHR or IEF.
Key characteristics
| SCHR | IEF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.05% | -2.03% |
| 1Y Return | -0.06% | -2.22% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.78% | -4.40% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.04% | -0.84% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.02% | 0.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.07 | -0.31 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.61% | 8.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.11% | -23.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.86% | -18.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHR and IEF is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHR vs. IEF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHR has outperformed IEF with an annualized return of 1.02%, while IEF has yielded a comparatively lower 0.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHR vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IEF's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHR vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHR vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison
SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than IEF's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHR Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.45% | 3.16% | 2.02% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 2.31% | 2.11% | 1.65% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.44% | 1.07% |
IEF iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.21% | 2.91% | 1.96% | 0.83% | 1.08% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 1.82% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 2.05% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
SCHR vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum IEF drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and IEF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHR vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.14%, while iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.