PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHR vs. SCHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHR achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than SCHQ's 0.37% return.


SCHR

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
-0.40%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
0.07%
10Y*
1.13%

SCHQ

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.95%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.37%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
-0.77%
5Y*
-5.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHR
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
-0.51%7.33%1.42%4.27%-10.58%-2.62%7.72%-1.23%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.37%5.50%-6.44%3.43%-29.44%-4.86%17.73%-4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHR and SCHQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.86

The correlation between SCHR and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHR vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHR
SCHR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SCHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHQ
SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHRSCHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.63

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

1.55

+1.26

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHR Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHR and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHR drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHR and SCHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHRSCHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-46.13%

+30.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-7.01%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-17.65%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.07%

-40.93%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-36.31%

+33.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-26.42%

+22.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.83%

-1.80%

Volatility

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHR) is 1.06%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that SCHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHRSCHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

2.09%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

6.08%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

8.66%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

14.49%

-9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

15.29%

-10.81%

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHR vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

SCHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than SCHQ's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
4.75%4.54%4.58%3.79%2.88%1.69%1.51%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHR
Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.92%3.85%3.77%3.16%2.02%1.00%1.62%2.31%2.11%1.65%1.45%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHR and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHQ has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to SCHR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHR dropped -16.11% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

On 5-year performance, SCHR leads with 0.07% vs -5.56% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHR has performed better with a 0.07% return vs -5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHR.

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 3.92% for SCHR.

SCHR tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHR and 0.03% for SCHQ.

SCHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHR and SCHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer