PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOT vs. RFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOT vs. RFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than RFG's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has outperformed RFG with an annualized return of 12.88%, while RFG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.33% annualized return.


VOT

1D
0.35%
1M
2.80%
YTD
8.61%
6M
6.54%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
12.88%

RFG

1D
0.86%
1M
0.78%
YTD
21.30%
6M
18.59%
1Y
33.66%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOT vs. RFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
8.61%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
21.30%8.80%17.80%16.42%-21.70%13.81%32.86%17.09%-13.98%20.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VOT and RFG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.90

The correlation between VOT and RFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOT vs. RFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOT
RFG

Technology

32.5%
22.8%

Industrials

23.2%
33.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
4.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
19.0%

Financial Services

6.9%
3.7%

Real Estate

4.5%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
0.5%

Utilities

3.2%
2.6%

Energy

1.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
4.8%

Technology

VOT
32.5%
RFG
22.8%

Industrials

VOT
23.2%
RFG
33.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VOT
12.8%
RFG
4.0%

Healthcare

VOT
8.9%
RFG
19.0%

Financial Services

VOT
6.9%
RFG
3.7%

Real Estate

VOT
4.5%
RFG
1.8%

Communication Services

VOT
3.6%
RFG
0.5%

Utilities

VOT
3.2%
RFG
2.6%

Energy

VOT
1.9%
RFG
4.9%

Basic Materials

VOT
1.6%
RFG
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOT
0.8%
RFG
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOT vs. RFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

RFG
RFG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOT vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOTRFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

3.25

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

13.06

-11.26

VOT vs. RFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the RFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOT and RFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOT vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, which is greater than RFG's maximum drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and RFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTRFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.16%

-51.93%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.96%

-10.41%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-26.71%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-35.16%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

-42.92%

+5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.55%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-8.95%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.35%

2.58%

+2.77%

Volatility

VOT vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) at 6.30%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTRFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

6.30%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

15.57%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

19.25%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

22.92%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

23.07%

-2.04%

VOT vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOT has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RFG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOT vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison

VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than RFG's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
0.14%0.43%0.38%0.99%0.78%0.05%0.27%0.64%0.76%0.66%0.35%0.61%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOT and RFG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to RFG (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs RFG's -51.93%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.88% vs 11.33% for RFG. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RFG has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.88% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFG.

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.14% for RFG.

VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while RFG is Small Cap Growth Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while RFG tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOT and 0.35% for RFG.

RFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOT and RFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer