RFG vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
RFG and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both RFG and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RFG vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFG vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 4.55% | 8.80% | 17.80% | 16.42% | -21.70% | 13.81% | 32.86% | 17.09% | -13.98% | 20.46% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.24% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 14.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RFG has underperformed RFV with an annualized return of 9.04%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.
RFG
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
RFV
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFG vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RFG and RFV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Return for Risk
RFG vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank
RFG
RFV
RFG vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFG | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.67 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.14 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.06 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 3.47 | +4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFG | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.67 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.42 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.36 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFG and RFV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFG vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RFV's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.38% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.05% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.04% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
Drawdowns
RFG vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and RFV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFG | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -71.82% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -15.62% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.16% | -24.65% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.92% | -52.24% | +9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -8.48% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -9.85% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 4.78% | -1.68% |
Volatility
RFG vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 5.23%. This indicates that RFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFG | RFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 5.23% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 13.17% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.25% | 24.40% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 22.22% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 25.05% | -2.07% |