PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RFG vs. FRTY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFG and FRTY is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

RFG vs. FRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.76%
-9.54%
RFG
FRTY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RFG:

1.02

FRTY:

1.61

Sortino Ratio

RFG:

1.50

FRTY:

2.12

Omega Ratio

RFG:

1.18

FRTY:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

RFG:

1.17

FRTY:

0.78

Martin Ratio

RFG:

4.34

FRTY:

10.08

Ulcer Index

RFG:

4.48%

FRTY:

3.75%

Daily Std Dev

RFG:

19.13%

FRTY:

23.56%

Max Drawdown

RFG:

-51.93%

FRTY:

-55.59%

Current Drawdown

RFG:

-8.88%

FRTY:

-25.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly lower than FRTY's 38.58% return.


RFG

YTD

18.30%

1M

-2.95%

6M

-0.94%

1Y

18.03%

5Y*

10.36%

10Y*

7.80%

FRTY

YTD

38.58%

1M

-2.24%

6M

12.87%

1Y

35.46%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFG vs. FRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FRTY's 0.60% expense ratio.


FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
Expense ratio chart for FRTY: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for RFG: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFG vs. FRTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RFG, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.021.61
The chart of Sortino ratio for RFG, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.502.12
The chart of Omega ratio for RFG, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.181.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for RFG, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.170.78
The chart of Martin ratio for RFG, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.3410.08
RFG
FRTY

The current RFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the FRTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFG and FRTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.02
1.61
RFG
FRTY

Dividends

RFG vs. FRTY - Dividend Comparison

RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while FRTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
0.32%0.99%0.78%0.26%0.27%0.64%0.76%0.66%0.35%0.61%0.60%0.65%
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RFG vs. FRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, smaller than the maximum FRTY drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and FRTY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-8.88%
-25.90%
RFG
FRTY

Volatility

RFG vs. FRTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) is 5.84%, while Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that RFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.84%
8.39%
RFG
FRTY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab