PortfoliosLab logo
RFG vs. FRTY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFG and FRTY is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

RFG vs. FRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.95%
-15.25%
RFG
FRTY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RFG:

-0.30

FRTY:

0.14

Sortino Ratio

RFG:

-0.27

FRTY:

0.37

Omega Ratio

RFG:

0.97

FRTY:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

RFG:

-0.27

FRTY:

0.10

Martin Ratio

RFG:

-0.77

FRTY:

0.36

Ulcer Index

RFG:

9.52%

FRTY:

10.93%

Daily Std Dev

RFG:

24.40%

FRTY:

28.44%

Max Drawdown

RFG:

-51.93%

FRTY:

-53.14%

Current Drawdown

RFG:

-13.62%

FRTY:

-30.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly higher than FRTY's -11.39% return.


RFG

YTD

-4.80%

1M

6.87%

6M

-10.76%

1Y

-7.24%

5Y*

11.55%

10Y*

6.45%

FRTY

YTD

-11.39%

1M

8.44%

6M

-12.87%

1Y

3.99%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFG vs. FRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FRTY's 0.60% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFG vs. FRTY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFG is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFG is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFG is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFG is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFG is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFG is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FRTY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRTY is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRTY is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRTY is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRTY is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRTY is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRTY is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RFG vs. FRTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the FRTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFG and FRTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.30
0.14
RFG
FRTY

Dividends

RFG vs. FRTY - Dividend Comparison

RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than FRTY's 0.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
0.32%0.38%0.99%0.78%0.26%0.27%0.64%0.76%0.66%0.35%0.61%0.60%
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
0.11%0.10%0.00%0.00%5.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RFG vs. FRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FRTY drawdown of -53.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and FRTY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.62%
-30.58%
RFG
FRTY

Volatility

RFG vs. FRTY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) have volatilities of 7.86% and 7.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.86%
7.56%
RFG
FRTY