VOT vs. MA
VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while MA (Mastercard Incorporated) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 12.41%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for MA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VOT vs. MA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than MA's -13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has underperformed MA with an annualized return of 12.41%, while MA has yielded a comparatively higher 18.60% annualized return.
VOT
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
MA
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -13.93%
- 6M
- -13.22%
- 1Y
- -8.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.60%
VOT vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.90% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -13.93% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 25.31% | 47.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and MA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOT and MA has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
MA
VOT vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOT | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.95 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | -0.41 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | -0.81 | +3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOT vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, roughly equal to the maximum MA drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and MA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -62.67% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -20.91% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -20.91% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -28.25% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -41.00% | +3.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.85% | +17.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -9.83% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 10.52% | -5.17% |
Volatility
VOT vs. MA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.47%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 6.47% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 17.06% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 22.01% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 24.04% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 26.93% | -5.87% |
Dividends
VOT vs. MA - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than MA's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.67% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOT and MA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to MA (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs MA's -62.67%.
VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOT and MA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer