MA vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about Mastercard Inc (MA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MA or COST.
Performance
MA vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a 23.01% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 40.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 20.74%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.37% annualized return.
MA
23.01%
1.02%
13.80%
31.06%
13.50%
20.74%
COST
40.12%
3.50%
16.27%
63.89%
27.29%
23.37%
Fundamentals
| MA | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $486.56B | $407.41B |
| EPS | $13.23 | $16.60 |
| PE Ratio | 40.00 | 55.39 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.96 | 5.50 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $27.23B | $254.45B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $25.03B | $32.10B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $15.99B | $12.15B |
Key characteristics
| MA | COST | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.04 | 3.27 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.71 | 3.92 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.72 | 6.18 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.76 | 15.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.75% | 3.97% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.73% | 19.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.67% | -53.39% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.60% | -2.57% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between MA and COST is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MA vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Inc (MA) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MA vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than COST's 2.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Inc | 0.51% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% | 0.51% | 0.25% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 2.12% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
MA vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MA vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
Mastercard Inc (MA) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.17%. This indicates that MA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MA vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Inc and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities