VOT vs. VXF
VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while VXF is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 12.50%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for VXF. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VOT vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 14.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOT having a 12.50% annualized return and VXF not far ahead at 12.53%.
VOT
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 10.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
VXF
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
VOT vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 7.86% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 14.55% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and VXF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VOT and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOT vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOT
VXF
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
VOT
VXF
Industrials
VOT
VXF
Consumer Cyclical
VOT
VXF
Healthcare
VOT
VXF
Financial Services
VOT
VXF
Real Estate
VOT
VXF
Communication Services
VOT
VXF
Utilities
VOT
VXF
Energy
VOT
VXF
Basic Materials
VOT
VXF
Consumer Defensive
VOT
VXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
VXF
VOT vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOT | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.77 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 9.75 | -7.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOT vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, roughly equal to the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -58.03% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -10.21% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -26.92% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -36.39% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -41.72% | +4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -1.05% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -9.54% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 2.90% | +2.45% |
Volatility
VOT vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) at 6.19%. This indicates that VOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 6.19% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 13.27% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 17.83% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 22.43% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 22.31% | -1.27% |
VOT vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VOT and VXF have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOT vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VXF's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VOT and VXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOT has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to VXF (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs VXF's -58.03%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.53% vs 12.50% for VOT. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VXF has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOT and VXF have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.62% for VOT.
VOT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while VXF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOT and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer