PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's 10.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOG has outperformed MGC with an annualized return of 18.15%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.36% annualized return.


VOOG

1D
-0.93%
1M
7.44%
YTD
13.78%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
18.15%

MGC

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.59%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.75%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.78%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
10.80%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and MGC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VOOG and MGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOG vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
MGC

Technology

49.4%
39.3%

Communication Services

18.0%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.1%

Financial Services

8.8%
11.7%

Industrials

6.2%
6.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.0%

Utilities

0.4%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.2%

Energy

0.1%
2.6%

Technology

VOOG
49.4%
MGC
39.3%

Communication Services

VOOG
18.0%
MGC
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.4%
MGC
10.1%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.8%
MGC
11.7%

Industrials

VOOG
6.2%
MGC
6.5%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.8%
MGC
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
MGC
4.8%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.6%
MGC
1.0%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
MGC
1.0%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.4%
MGC
1.2%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
MGC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOGMGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.03

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

13.61

-3.29

VOOG vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and MGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOGMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.42

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.86

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.90

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.60

+0.31

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and MGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-51.93%

+19.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-9.85%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-19.28%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-25.74%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-33.07%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.79%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-7.06%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.19%

+1.12%

Volatility

VOOG vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 3.04%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

3.04%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

9.27%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

12.32%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

17.27%

+3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

18.21%

+2.52%

VOOG vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than MGC's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.87%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.44%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VOOG and MGC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOOG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to MGC (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs MGC's -51.93%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 18.15% vs 16.36% for MGC. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGC has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 16.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOG.

MGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.44% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while MGC is Large Cap Blend Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.05% for MGC.

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and MGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer