MGC vs. SCHX
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MGC tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 16.51%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for SCHX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
MGC vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MGC having a 9.05% return and SCHX slightly higher at 9.45%. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 16.51%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.62% annualized return.
MGC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 27.57%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
MGC vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 9.05% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 9.45% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and SCHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between MGC and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
MGC vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
SCHX
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MGC
SCHX
Communication Services
MGC
SCHX
Financial Services
MGC
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
SCHX
Healthcare
MGC
SCHX
Industrials
MGC
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
MGC
SCHX
Energy
MGC
SCHX
Basic Materials
MGC
SCHX
Real Estate
MGC
SCHX
Utilities
MGC
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
SCHX
MGC vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.88 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 12.67 | -0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGC vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.26% | -34.33% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -9.02% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -19.04% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -25.41% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | -34.33% | +1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -1.84% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -3.96% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.05% | +0.22% |
Volatility
MGC vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 4.71%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.71% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 9.86% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 12.60% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 17.22% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 18.20% | +0.07% |
MGC vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGC vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, MGC and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MGC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to SCHX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.51% vs 15.62% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGC.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.88% for MGC.
MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.03% for SCHX.
MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer