PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGC vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGC vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MGC having a 9.05% return and SCHX slightly higher at 9.45%. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 16.51%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.62% annualized return.


MGC

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
9.05%
6M
8.78%
1Y
27.57%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
16.51%

SCHX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.14%
YTD
9.45%
6M
8.85%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
21.28%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGC vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
9.05%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%31.14%-3.45%22.61%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
9.45%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MGC and SCHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.99

The correlation between MGC and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

MGC vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MGC
SCHX

Technology

42.9%
37.8%

Communication Services

12.3%
9.8%

Financial Services

10.9%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.5%

Industrials

6.0%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.5%

Energy

2.3%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.0%

Utilities

0.9%
2.6%

Technology

MGC
42.9%
SCHX
37.8%

Communication Services

MGC
12.3%
SCHX
9.8%

Financial Services

MGC
10.9%
SCHX
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MGC
9.8%
SCHX
9.4%

Healthcare

MGC
8.6%
SCHX
8.5%

Industrials

MGC
6.0%
SCHX
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

MGC
4.4%
SCHX
4.5%

Energy

MGC
2.3%
SCHX
3.1%

Basic Materials

MGC
1.1%
SCHX
1.8%

Real Estate

MGC
0.9%
SCHX
2.0%

Utilities

MGC
0.9%
SCHX
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGC vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGC vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MGCSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.88

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

12.67

-0.47

MGC vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGC and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MGC vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGCSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.26%

-34.33%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.85%

-9.02%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-19.04%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-25.41%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

-34.33%

+1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-1.84%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-3.96%

-3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.05%

+0.22%

Volatility

MGC vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 4.71%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGCSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.71%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

9.86%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

12.60%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

17.22%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

18.20%

+0.07%

MGC vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MGC vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than SCHX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.88%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, MGC and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MGC has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to SCHX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.51% vs 15.62% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGC.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.88% for MGC.

MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.03% for SCHX.

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGC and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer