PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOG vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOG vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOOG achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 1.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOOG having a 18.00% annualized return and VONG not far ahead at 18.39%.


VOOG

1D
-2.34%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
8.71%
6M
7.44%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
14.06%
10Y*
18.00%

VONG

1D
-1.57%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
1.56%
6M
0.27%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
18.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOOG vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.71%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
1.56%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOG and VONG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.97

The correlation between VOOG and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOOG vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOG
VONG

Technology

52.6%
54.1%

Communication Services

16.7%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
12.5%

Financial Services

8.2%
4.8%

Healthcare

5.7%
6.9%

Industrials

5.7%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.5%
0.4%

Utilities

0.4%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.3%

Energy

0.1%
0.4%

Technology

VOOG
52.6%
VONG
54.1%

Communication Services

VOOG
16.7%
VONG
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOG
9.0%
VONG
12.5%

Financial Services

VOOG
8.2%
VONG
4.8%

Healthcare

VOOG
5.7%
VONG
6.9%

Industrials

VOOG
5.7%
VONG
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOOG
1.0%
VONG
2.5%

Real Estate

VOOG
0.5%
VONG
0.4%

Utilities

VOOG
0.4%
VONG
1.0%

Basic Materials

VOOG
0.3%
VONG
0.3%

Energy

VOOG
0.1%
VONG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOG vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOOG vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOGVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.12

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

3.64

+4.18

VOOG vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOG and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOG vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOG drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOG and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOGVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-32.72%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-16.23%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.18%

-23.27%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.73%

-32.72%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.73%

-32.72%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-6.82%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-4.88%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

4.97%

-1.52%

Volatility

VOOG vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.04%. This indicates that VOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOGVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

6.04%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

12.59%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.04%

16.17%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

21.45%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

20.92%

-0.11%

VOOG vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOOG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOG vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VONG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.47%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.46%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VOOG and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOOG has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to VONG (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOG dropped -32.73% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.39% vs 18.00% for VOOG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 18.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOG.

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.46% for VOOG.

VOOG is categorized as S&P 500, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOG and 0.06% for VONG.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOG and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer