VOO vs. SQQQ
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 14.98%/yr vs -54.75%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
VOO vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -36.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 14.98%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -54.75% annualized return.
VOO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.77%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 17.99%
- 6M
- -34.34%
- YTD
- -36.18%
- 1Y
- -51.42%
- 3Y*
- -51.15%
- 5Y*
- -45.04%
- 10Y*
- -54.75%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.82%
VOO vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.44% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -36.18% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and SQQQ is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | -0.90 |
The correlation between VOO and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
SQQQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
VOO
SQQQ
Communication Services
VOO
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
VOO
SQQQ
-
Industrials
VOO
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
VOO
SQQQ
-
Energy
VOO
SQQQ
-
Utilities
VOO
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
VOO
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
VOO
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
SQQQ
VOO vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.85 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.84 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | -1.53 | +11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -100.00% | +66.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -61.03% | +52.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -92.51% | +73.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -97.27% | +72.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -99.97% | +65.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -100.00% | +97.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -92.76% | +89.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 33.69% | -31.65% |
Volatility
VOO vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.36%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 21.99%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 21.99% | -18.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 46.34% | -36.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 56.15% | -43.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 67.92% | -51.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 66.60% | -48.60% |
VOO vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than SQQQ's 9.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.36% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (21.99%) compared to VOO (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 14.98% vs -54.75% for SQQQ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.98% return vs -54.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.36%, compared with 1.08% for VOO.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.95% for SQQQ.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer