PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 15.35%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.68% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

SQQQ

1D
-4.47%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
-39.28%
6M
-36.43%
1Y
-60.85%
3Y*
-54.68%
5Y*
-47.98%
10Y*
-55.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-39.28%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and SQQQ is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

-0.90

The correlation between VOO and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOO vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
SQQQ

Technology

35.7%

-

Financial Services

11.6%
103.4%

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

VOO
35.7%
SQQQ

-

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
SQQQ
103.4%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
SQQQ

-

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
SQQQ

-

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
SQQQ

-

Energy

VOO
3.5%
SQQQ

-

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
SQQQ

-

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
SQQQ

-

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.76

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

-0.93

+3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

-1.69

+14.66

VOO vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

-1.22

+3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

-0.72

+1.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

-0.84

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

-0.87

+1.75

Drawdowns

VOO vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-100.00%

+66.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-65.71%

+56.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-92.38%

+73.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-97.23%

+72.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-99.98%

+65.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-100.00%

+97.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-92.40%

+88.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

35.98%

-34.06%

Volatility

VOO vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 19.65%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

19.65%

-15.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

39.23%

-29.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

50.16%

-38.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

66.95%

-50.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

66.30%

-48.27%

VOO vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SQQQ's 11.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
11.25%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.35% vs -55.68% for SQQQ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.35% return vs -55.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.25%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.95% for SQQQ.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer