PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 15.56%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%

SPYV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and SPYV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.88

The correlation between VOO and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOO vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOO
SPYV

Technology

35.7%
21.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
14.7%

Communication Services

11.3%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.6%

Industrials

8.3%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.2%

Energy

3.5%
7.4%

Utilities

2.4%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.4%

Technology

VOO
35.7%
SPYV
21.2%

Financial Services

VOO
11.6%
SPYV
14.7%

Communication Services

VOO
11.3%
SPYV
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VOO
10.2%
SPYV
10.9%

Healthcare

VOO
8.5%
SPYV
11.6%

Industrials

VOO
8.3%
SPYV
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOO
4.9%
SPYV
9.2%

Energy

VOO
3.5%
SPYV
7.4%

Utilities

VOO
2.4%
SPYV
4.4%

Real Estate

VOO
1.9%
SPYV
3.3%

Basic Materials

VOO
1.8%
SPYV
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.43

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.73

13.16

+1.57

VOO vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.17

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.75

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.70

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.42

+0.46

Drawdowns

VOO vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-58.45%

+24.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.22%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-17.54%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-17.89%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-36.89%

+2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.57%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-8.72%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.62%

+0.29%

Volatility

VOO vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

1.98%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

7.04%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

9.84%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

14.40%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

16.94%

+1.07%

VOO vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOO vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and SPYV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 11.90% for SPYV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.04% for SPYV.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer