PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 15.50%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%

KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
6.86%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-19.86%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and KMB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and KMB has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.87

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.67

+3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.42

-1.03

+13.45

VOO vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOO vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum KMB drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-36.97%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-29.60%

+20.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-34.06%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-34.06%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-34.06%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-26.52%

+24.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-8.85%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

19.43%

-17.46%

Volatility

VOO vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 4.34%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

8.42%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

16.67%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

25.77%

-13.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

20.19%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

21.07%

-3.04%

Dividends

VOO vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and KMB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs KMB's -36.97%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer