PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMB vs. FXAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMB vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 0.87%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


KMB

1D
-2.01%
1M
2.76%
YTD
2.23%
6M
3.37%
1Y
-17.83%
3Y*
-6.09%
5Y*
-1.36%
10Y*
0.87%

FXAIX

1D
1.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
10.19%
6M
9.68%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMB vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
2.23%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
10.19%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and FXAIX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between KMB and FXAIX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMB vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMB vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMBFXAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.39

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

3.04

-3.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

13.75

-14.65

KMB vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMB vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and FXAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMBFXAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-33.79%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.60%

-8.89%

-20.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

-18.76%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.06%

-24.50%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-33.79%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.81%

-1.36%

-26.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-3.79%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.63%

1.96%

+17.67%

Volatility

KMB vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 4.77%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMBFXAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

4.77%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

9.91%

+7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.95%

12.47%

+13.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

17.01%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

18.11%

+3.00%

Dividends

KMB vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
5.05%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMB and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMB has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to FXAIX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMB and FXAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer