PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOO vs. FLPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOO vs. FLPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VOO having a 8.72% return and FLPSX slightly higher at 8.78%. Over the past 10 years, VOO has outperformed FLPSX with an annualized return of 15.35%, while FLPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.


VOO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.24%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
15.35%

FLPSX

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
8.78%
6M
10.09%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
10.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOO vs. FLPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
8.78%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VOO and FLPSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.85

The correlation between VOO and FLPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOO vs. FLPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOO vs. FLPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOOFLPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.37

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

8.05

+4.92

VOO vs. FLPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the FLPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOO and FLPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOOFLPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.66

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.47

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.62

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.85

+0.03

Drawdowns

VOO vs. FLPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum FLPSX drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FLPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOFLPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-54.81%

+20.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.87%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-17.66%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-18.76%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-38.16%

+4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.30%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-5.66%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.61%

-0.69%

Volatility

VOO vs. FLPSX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) at 3.28%. This indicates that VOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOFLPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

3.28%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

8.96%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

12.63%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

17.20%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.36%

+0.67%

VOO vs. FLPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLPSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

VOO vs. FLPSX - Dividend Comparison

VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FLPSX's 12.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
12.21%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOO and FLPSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to FLPSX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs FLPSX's -54.81%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOO and FLPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer