FLPSX vs. POAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX).
FLPSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 1989. POAGX is managed by PRIMECAP Odyssey Funds. It was launched on Nov 1, 2004.
Performance
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 0.95% | 14.69% | 7.23% | 14.41% | -5.69% | 24.46% | 9.34% | 25.75% | -10.80% | 18.88% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | -6.55% | 28.68% | 12.56% | 25.02% | -24.25% | 4.02% | 29.17% | 23.52% | -7.10% | 33.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLPSX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than POAGX's -6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FLPSX has underperformed POAGX with an annualized return of 10.11%, while POAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.
FLPSX
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
POAGX
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- -6.55%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLPSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than POAGX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLPSX vs. POAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FLPSX
POAGX
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLPSX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.81 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.73 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 7.07 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLPSX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.19 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.58 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLPSX and POAGX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Dividend Comparison
FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.16%, less than POAGX's 14.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 13.16% | 13.28% | 16.24% | 18.29% | 9.45% | 12.11% | 11.14% | 8.14% | 13.45% | 7.45% | 4.85% | 4.04% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 14.18% | 13.25% | 9.90% | 5.54% | 10.78% | 5.93% | 7.84% | 5.33% | 7.82% | 0.86% | 16.63% | 12.52% |
Drawdowns
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum POAGX drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and POAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLPSX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -55.77% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.50% | -16.87% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.76% | -38.80% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | -38.80% | +0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -13.08% | +6.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -9.58% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 4.13% | -1.07% |
Volatility
FLPSX vs. POAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) is 4.78%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that FLPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLPSX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 8.65% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 15.69% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 24.15% | -7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 22.65% | -5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 22.75% | -5.42% |