PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPSX vs. FLKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLPSX having a 10.70% return and FLKSX slightly lower at 10.64%.


FLPSX

1D
-0.02%
1M
2.47%
YTD
10.70%
6M
9.95%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
11.42%

FLKSX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.49%
YTD
10.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
10.70%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%10.73%
FLKSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
10.64%14.61%10.81%14.87%-5.16%24.70%9.32%25.16%-10.42%12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPSX and FLKSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FLPSX and FLKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPSX vs. FLKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKSX
FLKSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FLKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLPSXFLKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.53

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

8.63

-0.08

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FLKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPSX and FLKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than FLKSX's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and FLKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPSXFLKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-36.70%

-18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.87%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-16.53%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-17.82%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.09%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-4.56%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.59%

+0.01%

Volatility

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund (FLKSX) have volatilities of 3.44% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPSXFLKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.37%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.17%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

12.82%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

14.83%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

16.42%

+0.95%

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPSX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPSX vs. FLKSX - Dividend Comparison

FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than FLKSX's 6.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLKSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
6.66%7.37%13.98%6.70%3.47%5.34%1.47%2.47%1.52%0.63%0.00%0.00%
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
12.00%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FLPSX and FLKSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLPSX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to FLKSX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLPSX dropped -54.81% vs FLKSX's -36.70%.

FLKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPSX and FLKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer