PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLPSX vs. FMCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLPSX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FLPSX has underperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 11.02%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.


FLPSX

1D
0.31%
1M
2.49%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.00%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
11.02%

FMCSX

1D
0.72%
1M
4.53%
YTD
19.85%
6M
17.25%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
13.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
10.72%14.69%7.23%14.41%-5.69%24.46%9.34%25.75%-10.80%18.88%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
19.85%11.80%14.55%11.02%-6.40%28.64%11.43%25.39%-6.67%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FLPSX and FMCSX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1994

0.89

The correlation between FLPSX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLPSX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLPSX
FLPSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FLPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FLPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCSX
FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLPSXFMCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

4.05

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

15.54

-7.08

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLPSX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, smaller than the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and FMCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLPSXFMCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-62.19%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.55%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-22.33%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-22.33%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-40.55%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.69%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-9.34%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.22%

+0.38%

Volatility

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) is 3.59%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that FLPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLPSXFMCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

5.68%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

12.88%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

16.19%

-3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.80%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

18.63%

-1.26%

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLPSX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than FMCSX's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
12.00%13.28%16.24%18.29%9.45%12.11%11.14%8.14%13.45%7.45%4.85%4.04%
FMCSX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund
5.17%1.83%8.94%2.60%5.44%12.80%6.72%6.63%18.48%6.66%8.25%14.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLPSX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCSX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FLPSX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLPSX dropped -54.81% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLPSX and FMCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer