FLPSX vs. FMCSX
FLPSX (Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund) and FMCSX (Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FLPSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FMCSX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FLPSX returned 11.02%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for FMCSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLPSX charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMCSX.
Performance
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLPSX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FLPSX has underperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 11.02%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.
FLPSX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
FMCSX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 34.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 10.72% | 14.69% | 7.23% | 14.41% | -5.69% | 24.46% | 9.34% | 25.75% | -10.80% | 18.88% |
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | 19.85% | 11.80% | 14.55% | 11.02% | -6.40% | 28.64% | 11.43% | 25.39% | -6.67% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLPSX and FMCSX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 1994 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FLPSX and FMCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLPSX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank
FLPSX
FMCSX
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLPSX | FMCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 4.05 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 15.54 | -7.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLPSX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, smaller than the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLPSX and FMCSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLPSX | FMCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -62.19% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.87% | -8.55% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -22.33% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.76% | -22.33% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | -40.55% | +2.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.69% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -9.34% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.22% | +0.38% |
Volatility
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) is 3.59%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that FLPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLPSX | FMCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 5.68% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 12.88% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 16.19% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 17.80% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 18.63% | -1.26% |
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLPSX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLPSX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison
FLPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.00%, more than FMCSX's 5.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 12.00% | 13.28% | 16.24% | 18.29% | 9.45% | 12.11% | 11.14% | 8.14% | 13.45% | 7.45% | 4.85% | 4.04% |
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | 5.17% | 1.83% | 8.94% | 2.60% | 5.44% | 12.80% | 6.72% | 6.63% | 18.48% | 6.66% | 8.25% | 14.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLPSX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMCSX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FLPSX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLPSX dropped -54.81% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.
FMCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLPSX and FMCSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer