VOO vs. FFLC
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. VOO is passively managed, while FFLC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VOO returned 13.49%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for FFLC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLC.
Performance
VOO vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOO having a 8.72% return and FFLC slightly lower at 8.51%.
VOO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
FFLC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 21.68% |
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 8.51% | 17.67% | 27.89% | 25.07% | -0.04% | 24.53% | 18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and FFLC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VOO and FFLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOO vs. FFLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
FFLC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VOO
FFLC
Financial Services
VOO
FFLC
Communication Services
VOO
FFLC
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
FFLC
Healthcare
VOO
FFLC
Industrials
VOO
FFLC
Consumer Defensive
VOO
FFLC
Energy
VOO
FFLC
Utilities
VOO
FFLC
Real Estate
VOO
FFLC
Basic Materials
VOO
FFLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
FFLC
VOO vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOO | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.38 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 10.72 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOO | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.81 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.92 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 1.15 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
VOO vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and FFLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -19.72% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -9.98% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -19.72% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -19.72% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -2.38% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -2.99% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.21% | -0.29% |
Volatility
VOO vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.73%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 3.95% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 10.15% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 13.11% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 16.97% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.67% | +0.36% |
VOO vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than FFLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 1.01% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VOO and FFLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFLC has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to VOO (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs FFLC's -19.72%.
On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 15.52% vs 13.49% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 15.52% return vs 13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLC.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.01% for FFLC.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while FFLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.38% for FFLC.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and FFLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer