FFLC vs. SDCI
FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SDCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. FFLC is actively managed, while SDCI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFLC returned 16.06%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for SDCI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFLC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SDCI.
Performance
FFLC vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 19.77% return.
FFLC
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 8.34%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.06%
- 10Y*
- —
SDCI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 17.11%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FFLC vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 9.17% | 17.67% | 27.89% | 25.07% | -0.04% | 24.53% | 19.50% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 19.77% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLC and SDCI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between FFLC and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLC vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank
FFLC
SDCI
FFLC vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFLC | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.54 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.96 | 8.69 | +2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFLC vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and SDCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLC | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -45.79% | +26.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -9.92% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -11.96% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -18.55% | -1.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -9.92% | +7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -11.55% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.90% | -0.66% |
Volatility
FFLC vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) at 3.14%. This indicates that FFLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLC | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 3.14% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 14.30% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 16.91% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 18.37% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 17.05% | +0.64% |
FFLC vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLC vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison
FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SDCI's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 1.01% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 3.07% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFLC and SDCI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFLC has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to SDCI (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLC dropped -19.72% vs SDCI's -45.79%.
On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 19.28% vs 16.06% for FFLC. On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, SDCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 16.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.
SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 1.01% for FFLC.
FFLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SDCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLC and 0.60% for SDCI.
FFLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFLC and SDCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer