PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLC vs. INFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFLC vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFLC vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
-3.67%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%17.63%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
17.28%18.30%23.34%1.62%2.65%24.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than INFL's 17.28% return.


FFLC

1D
3.48%
1M
-5.49%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*

INFL

1D
2.12%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
17.28%
6M
16.92%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLC vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFLC vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLCINFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.51

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

1.99

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.32

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.14

9.88

-2.74

FFLC vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and INFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLCINFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.51

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.94

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and INFL is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FFLC vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than INFL's 0.91% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
1.14%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.91%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%0.00%

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and INFL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLCINFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-21.30%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-12.89%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-21.30%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-5.46%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.05%

-5.14%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.02%

-0.26%

Volatility

FFLC vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) have volatilities of 6.13% and 5.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFLCINFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

5.86%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

13.54%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

19.55%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.71%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.78%

17.78%

0.00%