FFLC vs. INFL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) and INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFLC returned 16.64%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for INFL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFLC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INFL.

Performance

FFLC vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFLC having a 11.06% return and INFL slightly higher at 11.53%.

FFLC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 27.64%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 16.64%
• 10Y*: —

INFL

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -7.06%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 18.83%
• 3Y*: 20.29%
• 5Y*: 12.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLC vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	11.06%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	19.26%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	11.53%	18.30%	23.34%	1.62%	2.65%	25.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and INFL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2021	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FFLC and INFL has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FFLC vs. INFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFLC	INFL
Technology	32.5%	-
Financial Services	11.6%	20.4%
Industrials	11.5%	1.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	-
Healthcare	8.1%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	2.3%
Energy	4.4%	41.8%
Utilities	2.6%	3.0%
Basic Materials	1.7%	21.1%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.3%

Return for Risk

FFLC vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 34
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 32
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLC	INFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.17	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	1.58	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.21	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	1.87	+0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.41	5.39	+7.02

FFLC vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and INFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLC	INFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-21.30%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-10.09%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-15.56%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-21.30%	+1.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-10.09%	+9.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-5.13%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	3.50%	-1.27%

Volatility

FFLC vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) have volatilities of 5.01% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLC	INFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	5.05%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	12.79%	-2.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.47%	16.18%	-2.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	17.77%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.68%	17.68%	0.00%

FFLC vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLC vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than INFL's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	0.99%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.95%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLC and INFL in my portfolio?

FFLC and INFL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFLC or INFL?

INFL has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to FFLC (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLC dropped -19.72% vs INFL's -21.30%.

Which ETF is better, FFLC or INFL?

On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 16.64% vs 12.01% for INFL. On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLC or INFL?

Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 16.64% return vs 12.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLC or INFL?

FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLC or INFL?

FFLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.95% for INFL.

What is the main difference between FFLC and INFL?

FFLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while INFL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLC and 0.85% for INFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.