PortfoliosLab logo
FFLC vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and SCHG is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

FFLC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%150.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
129.41%
116.66%
FFLC
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFLC:

0.56

SCHG:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

FFLC:

0.90

SCHG:

1.13

Omega Ratio

FFLC:

1.13

SCHG:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FFLC:

0.57

SCHG:

0.76

Martin Ratio

FFLC:

2.13

SCHG:

2.60

Ulcer Index

FFLC:

5.26%

SCHG:

6.83%

Daily Std Dev

FFLC:

19.90%

SCHG:

24.96%

Max Drawdown

FFLC:

-19.72%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

FFLC:

-7.96%

SCHG:

-10.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -6.26% return.


FFLC

YTD

-2.99%

1M

13.41%

6M

-1.99%

1Y

9.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

-6.26%

1M

15.64%

6M

0.02%

1Y

14.65%

5Y*

18.74%

10Y*

15.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFLC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FFLC: current value is 0.38%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FFLC: 0.38%
Expense ratio chart for SCHG: current value is 0.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SCHG: 0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFLC vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLC is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFLC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FFLC: 0.56
SCHG: 0.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FFLC: 0.90
SCHG: 1.13
The chart of Omega ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FFLC: 1.13
SCHG: 1.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FFLC: 0.57
SCHG: 0.76
The chart of Martin ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FFLC: 2.13
SCHG: 2.60

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.56
0.71
FFLC
SCHG

Dividends

FFLC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.98%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.96%
-10.22%
FFLC
SCHG

Volatility

FFLC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is 14.07%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 16.45%. This indicates that FFLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.07%
16.45%
FFLC
SCHG