PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 10.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONV having a 11.63% annualized return and SPYV not far ahead at 11.82%.


VONV

1D
0.96%
1M
3.00%
6M
15.57%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
34.27%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
11.63%
ALL TIME*
12.16%

SPYV

1D
0.58%
1M
1.27%
6M
7.26%
YTD
10.77%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
11.82%
ALL TIME*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$131.39M$118.35M$146.42M
$71.92M$88.86M$95.94M

VONV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
21.78%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
10.77%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and SPYV is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VONV and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
SPYV

Technology

19.9%
21.7%

Financial Services

18.6%
15.1%

Healthcare

12.7%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
10.6%

Industrials

10.5%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
8.8%

Energy

5.5%
6.6%

Utilities

3.9%
4.5%

Real Estate

3.8%
3.3%

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.3%
2.9%

Technology

VONV
19.9%
SPYV
21.7%

Financial Services

VONV
18.6%
SPYV
15.1%

Healthcare

VONV
12.7%
SPYV
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
10.9%
SPYV
10.6%

Industrials

VONV
10.5%
SPYV
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.5%
SPYV
8.8%

Energy

VONV
5.5%
SPYV
6.6%

Utilities

VONV
3.9%
SPYV
4.5%

Real Estate

VONV
3.8%
SPYV
3.3%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.4%
SPYV
3.3%

Communication Services

VONV
3.3%
SPYV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VONV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONVSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.41

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

3.55

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.69

13.74

+7.95

VONV vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is higher than the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-58.45%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.22%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-17.54%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-17.89%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-36.89%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.56%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-8.66%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.60%

-0.02%

Volatility

VONV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.59%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.59%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

7.16%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

9.89%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

14.31%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

16.89%

+0.32%

VONV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than SPYV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.68%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.54%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VONV and SPYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONV has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to SPYV (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, SPYV leads with 11.82% vs 11.63% for VONV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONV.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.54% for VONV.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.04% for SPYV.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer