PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. GVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. GVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VONV having a 14.28% return and GVUS slightly lower at 14.24%.


VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%

GVUS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.34%
YTD
14.24%
6M
14.89%
1Y
28.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. GVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%5.61%
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
14.24%15.90%14.08%5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and GVUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023

0.99

The correlation between VONV and GVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. GVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
GVUS

Financial Services

18.9%
19.2%

Technology

14.9%
15.0%

Industrials

13.1%
13.1%

Healthcare

10.9%
10.8%

Communication Services

8.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
7.1%

Energy

7.0%
6.9%

Utilities

4.4%
4.3%

Real Estate

4.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.8%

Financial Services

VONV
18.9%
GVUS
19.2%

Technology

VONV
14.9%
GVUS
15.0%

Industrials

VONV
13.1%
GVUS
13.1%

Healthcare

VONV
10.9%
GVUS
10.8%

Communication Services

VONV
8.5%
GVUS
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
7.3%
GVUS
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.2%
GVUS
7.1%

Energy

VONV
7.0%
GVUS
6.9%

Utilities

VONV
4.4%
GVUS
4.3%

Real Estate

VONV
4.1%
GVUS
4.0%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.8%
GVUS
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. GVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. GVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONVGVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

4.24

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

17.70

-0.15

VONV vs. GVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the GVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and GVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONVGVUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.55

-0.84

Drawdowns

VONV vs. GVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, which is greater than GVUS's maximum drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and GVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVGVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-15.82%

-22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.68%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-2.01%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.60%

+0.02%

Volatility

VONV vs. GVUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) have volatilities of 2.94% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVGVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.01%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

8.14%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

10.86%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

13.28%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

13.28%

+3.96%

VONV vs. GVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GVUS's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. GVUS - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than GVUS's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.58%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VONV and GVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GVUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs GVUS's -15.82%.

On 1-year performance, VONV leads with 28.35% vs 28.22% for GVUS. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VONV has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.

VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.12% for GVUS.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and GVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer