VONV vs. GVUS
VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) and GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - VONV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index while GVUS tracks the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VONV returned 28.31% vs 28.38% for GVUS. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VONV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GVUS.
Performance
VONV vs. GVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VONV having a 15.40% return and GVUS slightly higher at 15.43%.
VONV
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
GVUS
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 28.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONV vs. GVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 15.40% | 15.81% | 14.28% | 6.50% |
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 15.43% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONV and GVUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023 | 0.99 |
The correlation between VONV and GVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONV vs. GVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONV
GVUS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
VONV
GVUS
Technology
VONV
GVUS
Industrials
VONV
GVUS
Healthcare
VONV
GVUS
Communication Services
VONV
GVUS
Consumer Cyclical
VONV
GVUS
Consumer Defensive
VONV
GVUS
Energy
VONV
GVUS
Utilities
VONV
GVUS
Real Estate
VONV
GVUS
Basic Materials
VONV
GVUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONV vs. GVUS — Risk / Return Rank
VONV
GVUS
VONV vs. GVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VONV | GVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.17 | 4.27 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.35 | 17.63 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VONV vs. GVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, which is greater than GVUS's maximum drawdown of -15.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and GVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONV | GVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.21% | -15.82% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -6.68% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -1.98% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.61% | +0.03% |
Volatility
VONV vs. GVUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) at 3.89%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONV | GVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.89% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 8.65% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.30% | 11.24% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 13.33% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 13.33% | +3.90% |
VONV vs. GVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GVUS's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONV vs. GVUS - Dividend Comparison
VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than GVUS's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.56% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VONV and GVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONV has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to GVUS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs GVUS's -15.82%.
On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.38% vs 28.31% for VONV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.38% return vs 28.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.
VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.56% for GVUS.
VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.12% for GVUS.
GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONV and GVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer