PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. AUSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.


VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%

AUSF

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.67%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-15.93%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
6.72%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and AUSF is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.91

The correlation between VOE and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOE vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
AUSF

Financial Services

16.5%
18.7%

Industrials

14.0%
11.7%

Energy

12.8%
5.2%

Utilities

12.1%
4.0%

Technology

10.9%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
8.5%

Healthcare

6.3%
12.0%

Real Estate

6.0%
4.1%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
7.8%

Communication Services

2.2%
10.6%

Financial Services

VOE
16.5%
AUSF
18.7%

Industrials

VOE
14.0%
AUSF
11.7%

Energy

VOE
12.8%
AUSF
5.2%

Utilities

VOE
12.1%
AUSF
4.0%

Technology

VOE
10.9%
AUSF
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.9%
AUSF
8.5%

Healthcare

VOE
6.3%
AUSF
12.0%

Real Estate

VOE
6.0%
AUSF
4.1%

Basic Materials

VOE
5.8%
AUSF
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
5.7%
AUSF
7.8%

Communication Services

VOE
2.2%
AUSF
10.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOEAUSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.60

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

7.54

+4.96

VOE vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOEAUSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.50

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.94

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.65

-0.20

Drawdowns

VOE vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and AUSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEAUSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-44.25%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.84%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-12.29%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-14.23%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-2.26%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-4.22%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.01%

-0.19%

Volatility

VOE vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that VOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEAUSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.41%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

6.65%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

10.14%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

13.65%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

19.07%

-0.24%

VOE vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than AUSF's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.76%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOE and AUSF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOE has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 8.45% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.88% for VOE.

VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOE and 0.27% for AUSF.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and AUSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer