VO vs. VNQ
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 5.65%/yr for VNQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.
Performance
VO vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 11.77%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
VO vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and VNQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VO and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VO vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
VNQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
VO
VNQ
Industrials
VO
VNQ
Financial Services
VO
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
VO
VNQ
-
Energy
VO
VNQ
Utilities
VO
VNQ
-
Healthcare
VO
VNQ
-
Real Estate
VO
VNQ
Consumer Defensive
VO
VNQ
-
Basic Materials
VO
VNQ
Communication Services
VO
VNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
VO
VNQ
VO vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.56 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 4.90 | +3.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -73.07% | +14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.34% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -17.46% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -34.48% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -42.40% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -13.61% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.65% | -0.49% |
Volatility
VO vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.72% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 9.77% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 13.54% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 18.84% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 20.72% | -1.76% |
VO vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VNQ's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and VNQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.77% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VNQ is REIT. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.13% for VNQ.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer