VO vs. SCHD
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
VO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.77%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
VO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and SCHD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VO and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
VO
SCHD
Industrials
VO
SCHD
Financial Services
VO
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
VO
SCHD
Energy
VO
SCHD
Utilities
VO
SCHD
Healthcare
VO
SCHD
Real Estate
VO
SCHD
-
Consumer Defensive
VO
SCHD
Basic Materials
VO
SCHD
Communication Services
VO
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
VO
SCHD
VO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 5.70 | -3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 13.97 | -5.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -33.37% | -25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -4.61% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -16.13% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -16.85% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -33.37% | -6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.03% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -3.31% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.89% | +0.27% |
Volatility
VO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.05% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 7.53% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 10.93% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 14.38% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 16.72% | +2.24% |
VO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VO has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer