VO vs. RSPU
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while RSPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for RSPU. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPU.
Performance
VO vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than RSPU's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed RSPU with an annualized return of 11.77%, while RSPU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
RSPU
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
VO vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 6.94% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 4.37% | 17.13% | -2.70% | 22.94% | 6.89% | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and RSPU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.48 |
The correlation between VO and RSPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VO vs. RSPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
RSPU
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
VO
RSPU
-
Industrials
VO
RSPU
-
Financial Services
VO
RSPU
Consumer Cyclical
VO
RSPU
-
Energy
VO
RSPU
-
Utilities
VO
RSPU
Healthcare
VO
RSPU
-
Real Estate
VO
RSPU
-
Consumer Defensive
VO
RSPU
-
Basic Materials
VO
RSPU
-
Communication Services
VO
RSPU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank
VO
RSPU
VO vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 1.67 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 3.77 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than RSPU's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and RSPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -48.08% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.46% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -16.27% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -21.86% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -36.85% | -2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -5.28% | +4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -7.85% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 3.75% | -1.59% |
Volatility
VO vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 5.41% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 11.11% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 14.10% | -1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.95% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 19.10% | -0.14% |
VO vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VO vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than RSPU's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.49% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and RSPU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs RSPU's -48.08%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.77% vs 9.57% for RSPU. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RSPU is Utilities Equities. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.40% for RSPU.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and RSPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer