RSPU vs. UTES
RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. RSPU is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPU returned 9.73%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for UTES. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPU charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
RSPU vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 9.73%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.
RSPU
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
UTES
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 11.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
RSPU vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 8.91% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 4.37% | 17.13% | -2.70% | 22.94% | 6.89% | 9.43% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 5.02% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPU and UTES is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RSPU and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPU vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPU
UTES
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
RSPU
UTES
Financial Services
RSPU
UTES
-
Basic Materials
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Communication Services
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Energy
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Healthcare
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Industrials
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Real Estate
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Technology
RSPU
-
UTES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPU vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
RSPU
UTES
RSPU vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPU | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 0.83 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 1.81 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPU vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPU | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.08% | -35.39% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -13.88% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -17.62% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.86% | -20.40% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | -35.39% | -1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -4.78% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -5.53% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 6.36% | -2.54% |
Volatility
RSPU vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 4.98%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPU | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 6.66% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 16.75% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.13% | 21.48% | -7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 20.64% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 20.21% | -1.09% |
RSPU vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPU vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than UTES's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.52% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.44% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPU and UTES have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to RSPU (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.73% vs 9.73% for RSPU. On fees, RSPU is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPU is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.44% for UTES.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.49% for UTES.
RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPU and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer