PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. DEUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly lower than DEUS's 15.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VO having a 11.46% annualized return and DEUS not far behind at 11.41%.


VO

1D
1.03%
1M
1.58%
6M
10.76%
YTD
13.50%
1Y
17.71%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
10.37%

DEUS

1D
0.53%
1M
1.84%
6M
10.76%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
21.67%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$638.57K$826.95K$989.73K
$194.14M$292.34M$238.59M

VO vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
13.50%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
15.73%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%28.80%-9.16%20.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and DEUS is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.91

The correlation between VO and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VO vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VO
DEUS

Industrials

19.9%
18.7%

Technology

18.2%
10.5%

Financial Services

13.1%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
11.1%

Utilities

8.4%
7.4%

Healthcare

7.8%
12.9%

Energy

7.4%
5.2%

Real Estate

5.1%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.1%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.2%

Industrials

VO
19.9%
DEUS
18.7%

Technology

VO
18.2%
DEUS
10.5%

Financial Services

VO
13.1%
DEUS
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VO
9.0%
DEUS
11.1%

Utilities

VO
8.4%
DEUS
7.4%

Healthcare

VO
7.8%
DEUS
12.9%

Energy

VO
7.4%
DEUS
5.2%

Real Estate

VO
5.1%
DEUS
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

VO
4.6%
DEUS
7.5%

Basic Materials

VO
3.9%
DEUS
4.1%

Communication Services

VO
2.7%
DEUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VO vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VODEUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.19

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

12.26

-3.92

VO vs. DEUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the DEUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and DEUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VO vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than DEUS's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and DEUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VODEUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-40.47%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-6.83%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-16.69%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-20.89%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-40.47%

+1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.01%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-4.28%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.77%

+0.36%

Volatility

VO vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 2.31%, while Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VODEUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

3.05%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

8.23%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

11.14%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

15.49%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

17.95%

+0.92%

VO vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than DEUS's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.38%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%0.00%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.31%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and DEUS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEUS has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to VO (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs DEUS's -40.47%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.46% vs 11.41% for DEUS. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.31% for VO.

VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and DEUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer