DEUS vs. QLV
DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) and QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DEUS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while QLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEUS returned 9.39%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for QLV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEUS charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for QLV.
Performance
DEUS vs. QLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 5.48% return.
DEUS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 18.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
QLV
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DEUS vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 11.11% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 14.73% | -11.18% | 26.31% | 8.81% | 5.82% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 5.48% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEUS and QLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DEUS and QLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEUS vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEUS
QLV
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
DEUS
QLV
Technology
DEUS
QLV
Financial Services
DEUS
QLV
Healthcare
DEUS
QLV
Consumer Cyclical
DEUS
QLV
Consumer Defensive
DEUS
QLV
Utilities
DEUS
QLV
Energy
DEUS
QLV
Basic Materials
DEUS
QLV
Real Estate
DEUS
QLV
Communication Services
DEUS
QLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEUS vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank
DEUS
QLV
DEUS vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.85 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 2.68 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.28 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 9.69 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.85 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.85 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.69 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
DEUS vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, which is greater than QLV's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and QLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.47% | -33.71% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -6.19% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.69% | -12.05% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.89% | -17.93% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.81% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -4.00% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.45% | +0.35% |
Volatility
DEUS vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 1.61%. This indicates that DEUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEUS | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 1.61% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 5.34% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.02% | 7.65% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 12.64% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 16.57% | +1.41% |
DEUS vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DEUS vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison
DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than QLV's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEUS and QLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEUS has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to QLV (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs QLV's -33.71%.
On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 9.39% for DEUS. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.
QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.45% for DEUS.
DEUS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.22% for QLV.
QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEUS and QLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer