PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEUS vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEUS vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEUS achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 6.02% return.


DEUS

1D
0.73%
1M
2.26%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.97%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.31%

QLV

1D
0.09%
1M
2.29%
YTD
6.02%
6M
6.02%
1Y
15.01%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEUS vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
10.91%10.41%14.33%14.73%-11.18%26.31%8.81%5.82%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
6.02%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DEUS and QLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.86

The correlation between DEUS and QLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEUS vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEUS
QLV

Industrials

17.6%
6.3%

Technology

15.5%
28.6%

Financial Services

12.1%
12.3%

Healthcare

11.4%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
8.5%

Utilities

7.3%
6.5%

Energy

5.5%
5.8%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

4.3%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
8.4%

Industrials

DEUS
17.6%
QLV
6.3%

Technology

DEUS
15.5%
QLV
28.6%

Financial Services

DEUS
12.1%
QLV
12.3%

Healthcare

DEUS
11.4%
QLV
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DEUS
10.6%
QLV
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

DEUS
7.5%
QLV
8.5%

Utilities

DEUS
7.3%
QLV
6.5%

Energy

DEUS
5.5%
QLV
5.8%

Basic Materials

DEUS
4.5%
QLV
2.4%

Real Estate

DEUS
4.3%
QLV
1.7%

Communication Services

DEUS
3.8%
QLV
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEUS vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEUS vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEUSQLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.98

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

2.86

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.49

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.62

10.59

+0.03

DEUS vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEUS and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEUSQLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.98

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.87

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.70

-0.06

Drawdowns

DEUS vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEUS drawdown since its inception was -40.47%, which is greater than QLV's maximum drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEUS and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEUSQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-33.71%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-6.19%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-12.05%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-17.93%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-4.01%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.45%

+0.35%

Volatility

DEUS vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 1.55%. This indicates that DEUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEUSQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.55%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

5.38%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

7.63%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

12.64%

+2.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

16.57%

+1.41%

DEUS vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEUS has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DEUS vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

DEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than QLV's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.45%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.51%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEUS and QLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to QLV (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEUS dropped -40.47% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.99% vs 9.49% for DEUS. On fees, DEUS is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEUS is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.

QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.45% for DEUS.

DEUS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DEUS and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEUS and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer